{"id":"W2771999481","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.12.001","title":"Uncovering the mysteries of inclusion: Empirical and methodological possibilities in participatory evaluation in an international context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Citizen journalism; Privilege (computing); Context (archaeology); Participatory evaluation; Participatory action research; Empirical evidence; Public relations; Sociology; Empirical research; Power (physics); Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Engineering; Epistemology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1446991,0.001412124,0.006113497,0.006489622,0.003336255,0.01670453,0.0051636,0.006346197,0.004126096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1908898,0.0007628814,0.001715454,0.01298814,0.02363117,0.02512848,0.01156586,0.006327854,0.0003016617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007386131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03323663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006341478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0121085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8846251,0.08915382,0.005347548,0.00440348,0.01465919,0.001810924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6532491,0.3211963,0.008007821,0.005664672,0.01071749,0.001164632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001906916,0.0001241681,0.001640396,0.06513052,0.0006874604,0.0001405298,0.01387223,0.0005891606,0.0001873746,0.2565896,0.00549971,0.6553482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001250614,0.0002078234,0.003607439,0.2633046,0.001375122,0.0004394381,0.02910713,0.0007670569,0.001015292,0.4373557,0.2625627,0.0001325601],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003385036,0.9481066,0.008771273,0.03018874,0.000653452,0.000193986,0.00007360041,0.00001426349,0.008613011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1549151,0.8137237,0.01898636,0.008939554,0.0009169611,0.001124384,0.0001300307,0.00005548234,0.001208456],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8553009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7652511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8922807118038334,"score_gpt":0.7301766260124527,"score_spread":0.1621040857913807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}