{"id":"W2771999481","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.12.001","title":"Uncovering the mysteries of inclusion: Empirical and methodological possibilities in participatory evaluation in an international context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Citizen journalism; Privilege (computing); Context (archaeology); Participatory evaluation; Participatory action research; Empirical evidence; Public relations; Sociology; Empirical research; Power (physics); Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Engineering; Epistemology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06150194,0.0002345279,0.0009157932,0.0004416065,0.0002964109,0.0004517745,0.0005353441,0.0002130379,0.0003130883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008204847,0.0001384896,0.00009085654,0.0002844521,0.0002750381,0.0007465841,0.0005445777,0.0003413203,0.000003183999],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001533829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007090001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002933971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002657997,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9891104,0.006051161,0.001554442,0.0005223833,0.002554581,0.000207049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949964,0.002942557,0.0009654482,0.0004785121,0.0005500864,0.00006696907],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003042177,0.00004753995,0.03006868,0.0001551073,0.00001388265,9.290169e-7,0.01093271,0.0002132326,1.791597e-7,0.00006988383,0.000009524905,0.9584579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002250069,0.0007437077,0.1942967,0.008178119,0.0004170715,0.00003306469,0.01486506,0.173913,0.000001856486,0.02117863,0.583485,0.0006377682],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2031894,0.7926543,0.00003871861,0.0002769775,0.0004607272,0.002352751,0.00001233493,0.00001553845,0.0009992184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5856336,0.4113244,0.001079873,0.0001393139,0.0001568597,0.001426731,0.0001478871,0.00001879178,0.00007252415],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9822561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8922807118038334,"score_gpt":0.7301766260124527,"score_spread":0.1621040857913807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}