{"id":"W2772623775","doi":"10.1101/222729","title":"Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Evolution and Paleontology Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Phylogenetic comparative methods; Confusion; Phylogenetic tree; Probabilistic logic; Epistemology; Theme (computing); Field (mathematics); Data science; Biology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001234117,0.0005419344,0.0008333945,0.0001864947,0.0008628703,0.0002603756,0.0009630986,0.0005735393,0.0003236081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000283697,0.0005167485,0.0001808401,0.000153112,0.0005300217,0.0001255407,0.0001845244,0.001026404,0.0003220722],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002558165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003356812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000553405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001253247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970285,0.0006289491,0.0004547777,0.0009613836,0.000316829,0.0006095821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972394,0.0002954226,0.0006197061,0.001284378,0.0003116512,0.0002494394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000542582,0.00004938299,0.9861077,0.0002870458,0.0006526428,0.00008465783,0.0002589407,0.0006563673,0.009819042,0.0003987285,0.001589063,0.00004217884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002298935,0.00004691074,0.9837977,0.000169664,0.0001256625,2.31739e-8,0.000006805917,0.002098872,0.004824069,0.00006918248,0.00796745,0.0006637286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9422678,0.03922315,0.00485237,0.000822634,0.007297144,0.001121366,0.0006141804,0.0006643107,0.00313706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495433,0.0006160268,0.04909607,0.0002356494,0.0004577831,0.00001646055,7.369059e-7,0.00001493145,0.00001904154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04424369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07135914801299731,"score_gpt":0.3034782731372483,"score_spread":0.232119125124251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}