{"id":"W2772626097","doi":"10.1017/jpr.2017.59","title":"On the Parisian ruin of the dual Lévy risk model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Probability","topic":"Probability and Risk Models","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Ruin theory; Mathematics; Risk model; First-hitting-time model; Dual (grammatical number); Penalty method; Poisson distribution; Applied mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Mathematical optimization","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01914744,0.000194993,0.0005476729,0.00006358024,0.001070284,0.0002888261,0.003496714,0.0001570626,0.00009429295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008685261,0.00007682925,0.0005300359,0.0001919469,0.001126698,0.0002942028,0.0005147915,0.0009544144,0.00002434381],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008639383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003894165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002852548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009653807,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952433,0.0004427869,0.001503734,0.0003770393,0.002160407,0.0002727702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908729,0.002010429,0.003260364,0.003124822,0.0006019115,0.0001295832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002583926,0.001572407,0.03082328,0.00003910538,0.0001839408,0.00000331894,0.005854729,0.2717474,0.000927932,0.6134404,0.01159231,0.06123127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003959908,0.00008529922,0.02764867,0.00001919653,0.00003564919,0.00000459624,0.0001379401,0.01605973,0.001859468,0.9532474,0.0004151082,0.00009094251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749677,0.00002950306,0.003751025,0.005842609,0.0003365763,0.0005419179,0.00003331315,0.000006003102,0.0144914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974903,0.00001719692,0.002108518,0.0001803969,0.00008969525,0.000007899289,7.003194e-8,0.00000802145,0.00009787304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.339807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1408743947705294,"score_gpt":0.3544410465415095,"score_spread":0.2135666517709801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}