{"id":"W2772640060","doi":"10.13111/2066-8201.2017.9.4.5","title":"Cessna Citation X Business Aircraft Eigenvalue Stability – Part2: Flight Envelope Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INCAS BULLETIN","topic":"Aerospace and Aviation Technology","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère du Développement Économique, de l’Innovation et de l’Exportation","keywords":"Envelope (radar); Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Stability (learning theory); Aerospace engineering; Aeronautics; Citation; Engineering; Physics; Computer science; Library science; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003919375,0.0006058346,0.000451273,0.000865369,0.0004450665,0.001557011,0.0003252922,0.0005034572,0.01151898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008574961,0.0001687543,0.0007124932,0.0006032044,0.0005524344,0.0007907263,0.0005270696,0.000659378,0.002205467],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005299837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005072482,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003662838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001241339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997239,0.00004857492,0.000009655683,0.00004692372,0.0001444728,0.00002655241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996943,0.0001001904,0.00004481581,0.00004193418,0.0001096965,0.000009061728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001406824,0.00007794367,0.00428978,0.0002664515,0.00007400251,0.0003590989,0.0002381684,0.613897,0.03436251,0.1377616,0.01303498,0.1954978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006313866,0.00006690779,0.002638371,0.00004478365,0.000009671779,0.0001342779,0.00007006114,0.9437348,0.007215041,0.03020221,0.01585791,0.00001967661],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08417002,0.002353003,0.8002717,0.0005552218,0.0002645853,0.0001354018,0.0004396564,0.000574665,0.1112357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8800609,0.001736402,0.04865646,0.0001093987,0.0001857263,0.0002012127,0.0007459209,0.0002591054,0.06804478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01151898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03853482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01708318642984054,"score_gpt":0.228673761067532,"score_spread":0.2115905746376915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}