{"id":"W2773013777","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.004","title":"Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Workgroup; Psychological intervention; Systematic review; Risk assessment; Health care; Risk analysis (engineering); Context (archaeology); Actuarial science; Information bias; Reporting bias; Medicine; Applied psychology; Selection bias; Psychology; MEDLINE; Computer science; Business; Nursing; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6348782,0.01191926,0.02961633,0.04684799,0.006498876,0.0197033,0.02877969,0.03438388,0.01704402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8851581,0.015547,0.0677184,0.02796904,0.01310593,0.02281798,0.01397123,0.04402511,0.005807656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01548839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03275558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01899933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0252305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.149604,0.5608335,0.2257605,0.01267725,0.04880459,0.002320168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05344612,0.8075215,0.03770215,0.01885277,0.07934668,0.003130824],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006060722,0.0004573614,0.007374537,0.4476054,0.1273284,0.0009417125,0.006830108,0.005859477,0.001123543,0.02813517,0.1200543,0.2482293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01523063,0.0009932228,0.007668728,0.5708457,0.1535049,0.001419514,0.002204137,0.01904541,0.003627055,0.118229,0.1055342,0.001697591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003349036,0.2904213,0.4641627,0.12314,0.03347715,0.05247831,0.01434016,0.006536584,0.01209486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02491522,0.01809234,0.8957919,0.02198216,0.003341961,0.03223103,0.001635594,0.0008049442,0.001204914],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3651218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4502603,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.983329733355029,"score_gpt":0.7788333389815846,"score_spread":0.2044963943734445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}