{"id":"W2773087945","doi":"10.1111/1467-968x.12120","title":"Monotonicity In Word Formation: The Case Of Italo‐Romance Result State Adjectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Philological Society","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bentley (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Word (group theory); Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Meaning (existential); Romance; Adjective; Scope (computer science); Romance languages; Computer science; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Psychology; Philosophy; Noun; Epistemology; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002305944,0.0002726153,0.0003297872,0.0008786952,0.001145672,0.00142609,0.000469768,0.0004594171,0.002864841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006531346,0.0003649656,0.00035421,0.0006067106,0.004725334,0.003024434,0.001788876,0.0008432954,0.0003096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007374971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004129687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001024604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001090868,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977944,0.001321447,0.0001700028,0.0002712705,0.0003016027,0.0001412363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955071,0.002749455,0.0003863742,0.0007441699,0.0005519332,0.00006088639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003516384,0.0000803632,0.02588932,0.0003596794,0.00004815246,0.002392173,0.03341176,0.001460593,0.04248172,0.837346,0.0009183527,0.05526015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001690615,0.0004375843,0.0694919,0.0002538846,0.0001511167,0.008554626,0.03983751,0.03249027,0.07830843,0.714482,0.05560385,0.0002197701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9094522,0.0002240107,0.03253617,0.0003951382,0.00001712784,0.00004707918,0.00007798267,0.0001209404,0.05712928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952266,0.00002964626,0.00408909,0.00002497111,0.000005457821,0.00001592525,0.00002657956,0.00002797907,0.0005538176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002864841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01219511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04259558767301636,"score_gpt":0.2617364633269121,"score_spread":0.2191408756538957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}