{"id":"W2773087945","doi":"10.1111/1467-968x.12120","title":"Monotonicity In Word Formation: The Case Of Italo‐Romance Result State Adjectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Philological Society","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bentley (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Word (group theory); Linguistics; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Meaning (existential); Romance; Adjective; Scope (computer science); Romance languages; Computer science; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Psychology; Philosophy; Noun; Epistemology; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003555135,0.00009104773,0.0001554824,0.00001568461,0.0004210696,0.0000208105,0.0002165845,0.00004847251,0.0002405814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009871367,0.00005115375,0.0001917312,0.00009596592,0.000909898,0.0001204105,0.00001654916,0.000185296,0.000004584316],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004463461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001785604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001631099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004346712,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991826,0.0001029273,0.0003463395,0.000121815,0.0001117054,0.0001346521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999096,0.0002532945,0.0001927857,0.0002549853,0.0001872144,0.00001573722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003419319,0.001173164,0.0005228505,0.0001784989,0.000362396,0.000007843543,0.662495,0.002209971,0.000773075,0.3237447,0.0003226699,0.007867867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00216316,0.000713657,0.02765015,0.0001872744,0.0002952978,0.00008917131,0.07988529,0.03196276,0.01045332,0.8444089,0.001652767,0.000538278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752651,0.00002741266,0.009213369,0.01203067,0.0004141399,0.0003493002,0.0001066345,0.00003208167,0.002561304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991694,0.00002093525,0.0004166675,0.0000995493,0.0001375725,0.00001544511,0.000001280354,0.000005165928,0.0001339491],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5826097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3352557,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04259558767301636,"score_gpt":0.2617364633269121,"score_spread":0.2191408756538957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}