{"id":"W2773335122","doi":"10.1115/1.4038747","title":"Design and Evaluation of an Instrumented Wobble Board for Assessing and Training Dynamic Seated Balance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering","topic":"Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Speed wobble; Kinematics; Dynamic balance; Balance (ability); Balance disorders; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Computer science; Simulation; Engineering; Medicine; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00313747,0.001128499,0.0006509548,0.0007794674,0.0002011215,0.0005040833,0.001190312,0.0006809364,0.001404527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004621055,0.0004213216,0.0003508336,0.0003352418,0.0005593152,0.0006775219,0.0008803562,0.0004835962,0.0003699393],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002227281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001087958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005758171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000828132,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985202,0.0004431221,0.0001443386,0.0002970796,0.0004868447,0.0001083888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980123,0.0006021039,0.0002154549,0.0002429838,0.0005991448,0.0003279276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003217882,0.002200722,0.02764722,0.001026476,0.0001062053,0.0006968316,0.0006161369,0.006205207,0.6924189,0.001142575,0.0006149505,0.2641069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002064208,0.1666706,0.2248761,0.0003264172,0.0009451248,0.00444834,0.001037722,0.08824237,0.4814503,0.001303848,0.02823464,0.0004002987],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5255694,0.0006955319,0.4668294,0.0001656531,0.0002466783,0.004579287,0.0003440139,0.0006574346,0.0009125504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5692007,0.0005713382,0.4253968,0.0001592636,0.00006028129,0.002557439,0.0003588755,0.00008656242,0.001608799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00313747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01659274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07627596809785168,"score_gpt":0.4052976121860102,"score_spread":0.3290216440881585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}