{"id":"W2773616646","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.4999","title":"BUILDING BETTER LAW: HOW DESIGN THINKING CAN HELP US BE BETTER LAWYERS, MEET NEW CHALLENGES, AND CREATE THE FUTURE OF LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; J.W. McConnell Family Foundation","keywords":"Mindset; Variety (cybernetics); Design thinking; Relevance (law); Law; Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Engineering ethics; Practice of law; Legal profession; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02530582,0.00138698,0.0009728864,0.003785384,0.007431366,0.02810692,0.003467211,0.007759461,0.008116701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02241024,0.0008713748,0.001222264,0.002181899,0.05216891,0.03539731,0.007986963,0.009597832,0.002862632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009168158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01323886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004653378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005745745,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9752331,0.01802482,0.000771469,0.001430695,0.003377218,0.001162626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977856,0.01548925,0.0007598699,0.002939345,0.001655747,0.001299697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009227309,0.00005329594,0.0002413908,0.0003334754,0.00002389917,0.00008656735,0.009718606,0.0009224443,0.0002395658,0.9437042,0.01689533,0.02777207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001397868,0.00003477504,0.00009876603,0.0005872801,0.00001333359,0.0001154511,0.00579868,0.0008489402,0.0003478962,0.7772335,0.2148756,0.0000317467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.009406174,0.02486417,0.373723,0.2861496,0.003199017,0.0004094912,0.0001528791,0.001157076,0.3009387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3959184,0.03374321,0.4808804,0.0384171,0.001613561,0.001244148,0.0003063988,0.001133738,0.04674303],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02810692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1338316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08205352888496954,"score_gpt":0.2842031446469419,"score_spread":0.2021496157619724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}