{"id":"W2773886472","doi":"10.1109/iros.2017.8206621","title":"On integrating manipulability index into inverse kinematics solver","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Inverse kinematics; Solver; Kinematics; Trajectory; Computer science; Obstacle avoidance; Robot kinematics; Control theory (sociology); Mathematical optimization; Smoothness; Constraint (computer-aided design); Robot; Inverse; Cartesian coordinate system; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Mobile robot; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001291465,0.001307796,0.0009070915,0.0007753666,0.0003965272,0.0009692647,0.00102859,0.0009423743,0.003250064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002951612,0.0005416793,0.0007397999,0.0005319775,0.0006878915,0.001134422,0.001434327,0.00127546,0.0007336875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005206716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00155012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001848541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993215,0.0001861903,0.00003966323,0.0000892748,0.0003030517,0.00006032403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990667,0.0005610702,0.00008912563,0.0000838263,0.0001709859,0.00002842258],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009466648,0.00009958349,0.0006634509,0.0003579339,0.00006451065,0.000184326,0.0001880956,0.8122035,0.02142156,0.03791285,0.001082616,0.1257269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001127291,0.00005766683,0.00007568728,0.00002270965,0.00001293931,0.00004718679,0.00001463363,0.9912407,0.002724884,0.004075817,0.001708348,0.000008141378],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004212158,0.0001247114,0.99164,0.00005354931,0.00001595812,0.00003269102,0.000009018875,0.0002067072,0.0037053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1858299,0.0002977547,0.8097035,0.00009821659,0.00005070499,0.0001859371,0.00006176687,0.0004412467,0.003330932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003250064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01087254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0155513002843068,"score_gpt":0.2406824386815886,"score_spread":0.2251311383972818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}