{"id":"W2773901690","doi":"10.1109/esem.2017.69","title":"Assessing the Intuitiveness of Qualitative Contribution Relationships in Goal Models: An Exploratory Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Computer science; Meaning (existential); Diagrammatic reasoning; Set (abstract data type); Conceptual model; Process (computing); Representation (politics); Perception; Goal orientation; Human–computer interaction; Management science; Knowledge management; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02161908,0.0009841055,0.0005885232,0.0005254738,0.0008062003,0.002814945,0.001726401,0.002039484,0.005436753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1229346,0.0008160835,0.000690272,0.0003935882,0.002028022,0.003213045,0.002553478,0.002097496,0.0006610709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006177268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007336427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004035517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003106256,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867188,0.008955852,0.0009570663,0.001607617,0.001269758,0.0004908424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7019674,0.276128,0.006639213,0.008854466,0.004493841,0.001917102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02578203,0.06112821,0.09345254,0.006277942,0.000518798,0.001593782,0.4098276,0.01437854,0.2314851,0.01112855,0.002946642,0.1414803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01272814,0.2031067,0.2246661,0.001754977,0.001772851,0.002551582,0.1269976,0.1545972,0.2006041,0.03740068,0.03211493,0.001705131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893413,0.00002263673,0.007813975,0.00009058864,0.00001782429,0.001018945,0.00007591483,0.00007727456,0.001541551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96975,0.00004430558,0.02687436,0.000151008,0.00001936908,0.002235296,0.0001247327,0.00004711709,0.0007537726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02161908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114334,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3996984502573646,"score_gpt":0.4807320913996817,"score_spread":0.08103364114231709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}