{"id":"W2773920300","doi":"10.3758/s13423-017-1410-9","title":"Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Inhibition of return; Psychology; Inhibitory postsynaptic potential; Response inhibition; Neuroscience; Cognitive psychology; Visual attention; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Audiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008229586,0.0004901502,0.0010528,0.0004659616,0.0001742523,0.00119514,0.001409582,0.00104995,0.001537434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003172542,0.0001982933,0.0004548801,0.0004192423,0.001681189,0.001159287,0.0005651063,0.001715135,0.0004668832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004715534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005116938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008550105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006489742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995707,0.00005759692,0.00003707837,0.0001445911,0.0001333828,0.00005679781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983957,0.0007647605,0.0003280135,0.0001963601,0.0002282834,0.00008687092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002093616,0.0002075875,0.01615114,0.003325583,0.0006071276,0.002354439,0.000586463,0.001479474,0.1171103,0.04024864,0.01057951,0.8052561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000991576,0.002367854,0.3246298,0.003228726,0.002577588,0.05261334,0.0008078032,0.01855594,0.1326812,0.2731434,0.1879278,0.0004751529],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3829581,0.4597811,0.0887198,0.01509465,0.002989397,0.000114692,0.0004380257,0.001550728,0.04835349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9134489,0.07255752,0.005167507,0.002588505,0.002290541,0.00003507798,0.0001493557,0.000263177,0.003499482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001537434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005143285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1087931269764523,"score_gpt":0.360453845882403,"score_spread":0.2516607189059507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}