{"id":"W2774363476","doi":"10.1093/gigascience/gix121","title":"The intriguing evolution of effect sizes in biomedical research over time: smaller but more often statistically significant","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GigaScience","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse; Université de Toulouse; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Computational biology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.134143,0.0006484437,0.001429887,0.01387859,0.0009410309,0.004336665,0.001568655,0.001652303,0.00387312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.445834,0.0006605646,0.002817988,0.01163294,0.005511116,0.007978633,0.003331404,0.002810886,0.0004902199],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001779159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001695871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00113529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001753186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8837562,0.04744041,0.02793269,0.02298966,0.01673353,0.001147487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2368124,0.6624383,0.05205576,0.03217281,0.01435713,0.002163487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001484465,0.0001161642,0.5211416,0.02768899,0.01348899,0.001192468,0.009745705,0.002227778,0.00856727,0.04247263,0.01278419,0.3590896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001585904,0.0006982712,0.8446897,0.004638513,0.004267626,0.003402236,0.00387822,0.002763238,0.005543491,0.07465639,0.05502482,0.0002789149],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4953762,0.2431751,0.1696928,0.04688482,0.004415599,0.0006236665,0.01707744,0.001585858,0.02116851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471607,0.008626117,0.03688638,0.002931444,0.001296113,0.0003966349,0.001922162,0.0002669578,0.0005135192],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.865857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7094245,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.58753692297953,"score_gpt":0.5720309981907186,"score_spread":0.01550592478881141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}