{"id":"W2774655121","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2013-0023","title":"The choice of the social discount rate and the opportunity cost of public funds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social discount rate; Economics; Crowding out; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Viewpoints; Opportunity cost; Consumption (sociology); Rate of return; Revenue; Social cost; Investment (military); Finance; Microeconomics; Cost–benefit analysis; Monetary economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002698775,0.0001364417,0.0007383198,0.0002438376,0.0003958022,0.0001710744,0.0006595213,0.00007815417,0.0001692108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005561172,0.00007303107,0.0007182116,0.0006573618,0.0004802387,0.0003807604,0.0001262958,0.0002804978,0.000008910708],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006829581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004429862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001056926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005153372,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981269,0.00009048393,0.001315343,0.0001364479,0.00007913129,0.0002516966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964553,0.0004932512,0.002426533,0.000346129,0.0001685861,0.0001102088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001211437,0.000202864,0.668711,0.00004691283,0.005514498,5.181339e-7,0.00175873,0.0005628,0.00005203221,0.3098239,0.004780659,0.008424982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001080288,0.00003129501,0.9283194,0.000007821094,0.0004020859,0.000002681604,0.0006178975,0.004474409,0.00004478154,0.0580402,0.006849398,0.0001297476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750653,0.0009786283,0.0001395667,0.0176763,0.0001924072,0.00018384,0.0001263576,0.000001769765,0.005635857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986148,0.0004456196,0.000008958991,0.0003763922,0.0001948607,0.000008851017,0.000002556435,0.000009631827,0.0003383072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2596084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3044231,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05938591816842495,"score_gpt":0.2565203290424134,"score_spread":0.1971344108739884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}