{"id":"W2775176094","doi":"10.1504/ijvp.2018.10009700","title":"Optimal path planning for unmanned ground vehicles using potential field method and optimal control method","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Vehicle Performance","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Motion planning; Optimal control; Field (mathematics); Path (computing); Potential field; Control (management); Computer science; Aerospace engineering; Control theory (sociology); Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Robot; Geophysics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001504884,0.0001748893,0.0003073754,0.0001799596,0.0004355175,0.0006917238,0.001640076,0.00009231037,0.000002734585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002434438,0.000158976,0.0001259265,0.00003923259,0.00005194322,0.001834102,0.0002556578,0.0002998821,0.000001227324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006797267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001136946,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002420403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.362168e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983066,0.00007924315,0.0005051875,0.0002612875,0.0005529203,0.0002947811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978257,0.0003737404,0.0008634026,0.0002697944,0.0005415684,0.0001258307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007483422,0.0001024979,0.01083157,0.00003513985,0.0004483332,0.0003536681,0.001041391,0.8067323,0.01607851,0.000549263,0.0002363268,0.1628426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002246911,0.0004119072,0.01874635,0.0001819057,0.00003651086,0.001063654,0.00003785502,0.9716636,0.005042242,0.0002001176,0.0001926848,0.0001762819],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3665493,0.0001047974,0.6313943,0.0009223898,0.0009235702,0.00006881718,0.000005275164,0.00001285304,0.00001861885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5002452,0.00001064881,0.4991721,0.0001440708,0.0004009664,0.000002054739,4.855372e-7,0.000007680062,0.00001681442],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1649313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6670308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03373568873278731,"score_gpt":0.3597245771635071,"score_spread":0.3259888884307198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}