{"id":"W27752640","doi":"","title":"A comparative case study of appreciative inquiries in one organization: implications for practice*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala","topic":"Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Appreciative inquiry; Transformational leadership; Credibility; Affect (linguistics); Intervention (counseling); Quality (philosophy); Generative grammar; Comparative case; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005979617,0.0001811669,0.0004198643,0.0002025384,0.0002677986,0.0001909956,0.0002414644,0.0001031231,0.0002631047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001490867,0.0001985071,0.00009706696,0.001154536,0.0002189427,0.0009207844,0.0001570655,0.0002300353,0.0000154418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009264084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006528987,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002990871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001508277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998729,0.00007079091,0.000555117,0.0002906242,0.0001469066,0.000207581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972224,0.000337407,0.0006610139,0.0002050698,0.001557659,0.00001651335],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018388,0.006505205,0.5142626,0.00107517,0.0007349564,0.00004531485,0.07064074,0.0000419314,0.001182729,0.3986222,0.004343095,0.002362209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008526064,0.0006270242,0.3378151,0.0006417293,0.001881554,0.0001404196,0.5852794,0.0005593644,0.000768892,0.02241413,0.03933668,0.002009659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860436,0.00008292666,0.01058423,0.0007841839,0.0002130208,0.001473121,0.0000470593,0.00005710657,0.0007147318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978763,0.000003772044,0.0005779371,0.0002635455,0.0009254122,0.0001290639,0.0001372869,0.00003552874,0.00005113124],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5146387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8094883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0986339371055154,"score_gpt":0.3585208693816516,"score_spread":0.2598869322761362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}