{"id":"W2775309603","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-66023-3_194","title":"Physical Attractiveness in Advertising: Can an Endorser Be Too Attractive? An Abstract","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Developments in marketing science: proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Advertising; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Physical attractiveness; Value (mathematics); Point (geometry); Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Business; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04121546,0.0006801961,0.0009126266,0.001655148,0.001621609,0.0001797606,0.007379964,0.0006302941,0.0001966087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003668949,0.0006194255,0.0001568527,0.0007083556,0.01005438,0.002545063,0.001029657,0.002373286,0.000005913079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000755128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001097152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006330887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002460204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921387,0.0001731649,0.001401642,0.002392615,0.00250127,0.001392618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949495,0.0008698535,0.002749008,0.0005830589,0.0005620119,0.0002866055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005086154,0.002382509,0.6837994,0.0006386336,0.0001083919,0.000034787,0.02345949,0.0000287579,0.1545619,0.03321299,0.0006773658,0.09600965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000591077,0.00006132577,0.9914975,0.001772035,0.00003141265,0.00004571185,0.0008721966,0.0000226996,0.001745753,0.001922992,0.0007725987,0.0006647233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.705873,0.00003626229,1.130106e-7,0.0002828132,0.0005624727,0.0005521895,0.00001799279,0.00002972675,0.2926454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763569,0.00002472776,0.001255477,0.0001527061,0.0001210867,0.00004284239,0.000002171761,0.00005944888,0.02198464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3076981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999283,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05520661805579261,"score_gpt":0.3725953623494341,"score_spread":0.3173887442936415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}