{"id":"W2775452065","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.2020","title":"Co‐producing simulation models to inform resource management: a case study from southwest South Dakota","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering","funders":"U.S. Department of the Interior","keywords":"Environmental resource management; Vegetation (pathology); Simulation modeling; Land management; Climate change; Resource management (computing); Rangeland management; Resource (disambiguation); Rangeland; Productivity; Computer science; Process (computing); Environmental science; Land use; Ecology; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003556899,0.0004699442,0.000225658,0.0005697425,0.002852159,0.001443227,0.001171436,0.0009981585,0.001672127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004187271,0.0003563403,0.0004073366,0.001052462,0.0009175263,0.0009969638,0.001597775,0.0009749918,0.0001359417],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00916462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007053085,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2786233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4978717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982008,0.001355256,0.00007331379,0.0001043469,0.0001402856,0.0001260235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942908,0.003795533,0.0002483882,0.0003937472,0.0007873431,0.000484028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005579449,0.00288392,0.2493534,0.0004452579,0.0003506013,0.01247815,0.02867044,0.6116937,0.00598024,0.02172869,0.00817981,0.05767775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002657893,0.0007918063,0.05805406,0.0002887615,0.0001675206,0.0005921143,0.0569903,0.8210623,0.004222985,0.005474711,0.05192697,0.0001626983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825936,0.0001132546,0.00427389,0.001479837,0.00001735562,0.0003011278,0.0002800617,0.00008369581,0.01085722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823042,0.000169075,0.01501546,0.0001283608,0.000005650995,0.0001736604,0.0002124946,0.00003062931,0.001960352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2786233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.554003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06641310822679171,"score_gpt":0.2934609021631857,"score_spread":0.227047793936394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}