{"id":"W2775516587","doi":"10.1007/s11192-017-2593-6","title":"Assessing the effect of the United States’ “citation advantage” on other countries’ scientific impact as measured in the Web of Science (WoS) database","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Relation (database); Citation database; Visibility; Citation analysis; Computer science; Database; Citation impact; Data science; Political science; Regional science; Library science; Scopus; Sociology; Geography; Law; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2244995,0.0002839547,0.0004604514,0.1217754,0.003741613,0.01546373,0.01670086,0.00009725178,0.0001120579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2981451,0.0001108133,0.0002794201,0.5253583,0.008851208,0.002672829,0.001675385,0.0005848216,0.00007838703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003891235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001763854,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008109189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006985458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9587404,0.001728949,0.001157134,0.001193126,0.03602387,0.00115652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596142,0.02317583,0.002185164,0.006391074,0.008257183,0.0003766158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001131474,0.000300284,0.9568405,0.00003531785,0.00001898952,0.000007938786,0.001732373,0.001898575,0.01502512,0.001551247,0.00347185,0.01900466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001467529,0.000692023,0.9217571,0.000115877,0.00002756931,0.0000085825,0.002704873,0.03122532,0.03181839,0.001203832,0.0087111,0.0002677793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921231,0.0002424871,0.0003370418,0.0009744827,0.00190051,0.0009372737,0.0002002702,0.000009458673,0.00327537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994054,0.00004531843,0.00006423931,0.0001471989,0.0000314869,0.00001333334,0.000007033022,0.0000137132,0.0002722459],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.403583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4570312116954996,"score_gpt":0.6150197274678524,"score_spread":0.1579885157723528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}