{"id":"W2775670936","doi":"10.1111/rec.12654","title":"Functional flows: an environmental flow regime benefits riparian cottonwoods along the Waterton River, Alberta","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates; Alberta Environment and Parks","keywords":"Riparian zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Woodland; STREAMS; Geology; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001068431,0.0001152231,0.00005620056,0.0004665211,0.0006418842,0.0004456503,0.0002724566,0.00008144132,0.0009791604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002089293,0.00006798288,0.00004980094,0.0003418996,0.0004374209,0.0001693948,0.0002372382,0.0001026982,0.00004803466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002526579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001947976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4551512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8644624,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999321,0.000005564983,0.000001894391,0.00001483607,0.00001668009,0.00002891819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999104,0.000006454929,0.00001918921,0.000003381643,0.00002066692,0.00003998086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004233649,0.0002200898,0.8759573,0.0000454558,0.00003022089,0.001177479,0.003741137,0.001826215,0.03616673,0.0013987,0.001107384,0.07790581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003777863,0.00003069462,0.9967619,0.000004207732,0.000003943205,0.00005015227,0.0008188726,0.0004501972,0.0004894253,0.00009281772,0.001289768,0.000004106381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998796,0.00003603337,0.00006586859,0.00002001997,0.000001037169,0.00000429624,0.00006174741,0.000005262418,0.001009689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981085,0.00006722251,0.0001737536,0.00001400939,0.000001920793,0.000002853554,0.00009137702,0.000001602348,0.00153877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5448488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9050038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01474912451757924,"score_gpt":0.2165784804430097,"score_spread":0.2018293559254305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}