{"id":"W2775670936","doi":"10.1111/rec.12654","title":"Functional flows: an environmental flow regime benefits riparian cottonwoods along the Waterton River, Alberta","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Restoration Ecology","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Lethbridge","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates; Alberta Environment and Parks","keywords":"Riparian zone; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Woodland; STREAMS; Geology; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002924831,0.0001625476,0.0001442095,0.00002278818,0.001478335,0.00005218012,0.000456242,0.0002020855,0.006035814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003532002,0.0001251839,0.00004497521,0.00002806135,0.0006138734,0.0008694559,0.00009565034,0.0001757107,0.001320971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001059902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002051655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009106777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02820363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998772,0.0001086339,0.0002237312,0.0003965776,0.000199118,0.0002999989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991152,0.00006647345,0.0001525176,0.0005573868,0.000004622668,0.0001038012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002185149,0.0004568243,0.9324443,0.000005821941,0.0000638257,0.00002633836,0.001725138,0.04664912,0.003973566,0.0007056803,0.005768813,0.007962087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006039812,0.0002396682,0.9475728,0.000002840565,0.00003919766,0.00002593266,0.00003074756,0.009756788,0.0008016106,0.0004181461,0.04031652,0.0001917662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926214,0.00003702295,0.0001870401,0.003396534,0.0006398692,0.0002180858,0.00001147607,0.00002717615,0.00286142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996182,0.00005729347,0.0002187305,0.0006306839,0.0001447315,0.00004980091,0.0002042223,0.00001337736,0.002499144],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03689233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01474912451757924,"score_gpt":0.2165784804430097,"score_spread":0.2018293559254305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}