{"id":"W2775789537","doi":"10.1190/int-2017-0135.1","title":"Seismic reservoir characterization of Utica-Point Pleasant shale with efforts at fracability evaluation — Part 2: A case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interpretation","topic":"Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Virtual Materials Group (Canada); ARC Resources (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Petrophysics; Brittleness; Oil shale; Geology; Seismic inversion; Reservoir modeling; Poisson's ratio; Seismology; Characterization (materials science); Geotechnical engineering; Inversion (geology); Modulus; Petrology; Mineralogy; Petroleum engineering; Poisson distribution; Statistics; Mathematics; Materials science; Porosity; Paleontology; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002817497,0.000458508,0.0003901894,0.001531787,0.0007125971,0.0006899488,0.0005787801,0.000958626,0.001219639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005611767,0.0002014962,0.0003069438,0.001496232,0.0004090744,0.0003898329,0.0003689412,0.0003421535,0.0001676619],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005757677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003956751,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02195638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0502851,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998536,0.00001380118,0.00001314204,0.00003593741,0.00005287426,0.000030548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997091,0.0000788589,0.00003406246,0.00004055036,0.00009604877,0.00004133068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001071644,0.001473562,0.5892209,0.000411405,0.000159287,0.02419224,0.003939086,0.1426954,0.1499552,0.00130306,0.001136267,0.08444181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009989384,0.001097178,0.6016852,0.00005551902,0.00008034162,0.002428863,0.005374634,0.3129094,0.07168864,0.0006406495,0.003824732,0.000114945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981516,0.00002366072,0.0009175915,0.00002393134,0.000001835741,0.000026012,0.0001756186,0.00002842347,0.0006514111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980845,0.00002259657,0.00110361,0.00000394391,0.000001488478,0.000007941483,0.0001584386,0.000004851208,0.0006125467],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02195638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04365718,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02421762861113382,"score_gpt":0.2848890449985932,"score_spread":0.2606714163874594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}