{"id":"W2775793002","doi":"10.1515/agph-2017-0020","title":"Sartre’s Case for Nonthetic Consciousness: The Ground of the Cartesian Cogito’s Certainty and the Methodological Basis for Phenomenological Ontology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Cogito ergo sum; Certainty; Consciousness; Ontology; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Object (grammar); Soundness; Philosophy; Phenomenology (philosophy); Psychology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002334292,0.0004580223,0.0009529709,0.00008114054,0.003190381,0.00009703563,0.001702603,0.000357981,0.00007602495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001881835,0.0002193273,0.0005526806,0.000085908,0.008516683,0.000094367,0.0005992595,0.0007023173,0.00001363777],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002621469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006234957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002979162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004882727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955914,0.001859779,0.0007230947,0.0008416399,0.0001841646,0.0007999456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889802,0.00789091,0.0007144668,0.002140065,0.0001394718,0.0001348556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003466206,0.000257978,0.0006397173,0.00005600823,0.0009570052,0.00007013545,0.004425543,0.000006829888,0.0001119689,0.9852357,0.0004163058,0.004356632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005590945,0.0005824929,0.008247864,0.00002130053,0.0007875183,0.00134268,0.001031463,0.0001382211,0.00002705313,0.9792823,0.002637173,0.000311019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4980291,0.003042086,0.004177711,0.4138539,0.003722875,0.007069813,0.0007263024,0.0001258234,0.06925236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993736,0.00003111499,0.001005124,0.003142985,0.0009355668,0.0009117885,0.00001218051,0.00004377521,0.000181477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4957069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1417191589762004,"score_gpt":0.3883996740680827,"score_spread":0.2466805150918823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}