{"id":"W2776180143","doi":"","title":"Lies in Conversation: An Examination of Deception Using Automated Linguistic Analysis - eScholarship","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Communication source; Psychology; Deception; Ambivalence; Style (visual arts); Linguistics; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science; Literature; Art; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008052277,0.000433689,0.0003445435,0.007499386,0.001832508,0.003251508,0.00108943,0.0009248833,0.001333606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04070894,0.0003113054,0.0005312848,0.003667423,0.002401628,0.004730632,0.003767753,0.001595325,0.0003921853],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001137046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001184115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003155873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003692062,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913641,0.004643731,0.0007242733,0.0004888374,0.002491208,0.0002877399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299286,0.04427611,0.01301411,0.003608732,0.008554085,0.0006183633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003932733,0.0007565607,0.3067943,0.001467817,0.0002550987,0.002098501,0.4097335,0.002059171,0.01555595,0.01708949,0.001920525,0.241876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004018341,0.0006305031,0.7147099,0.001071085,0.0001933873,0.004161571,0.2006207,0.02373366,0.0103288,0.02123075,0.02305282,0.0002266455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606191,0.001082312,0.02145001,0.0006868289,0.00002472601,0.0004357319,0.0003077582,0.00008712136,0.01530641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827436,0.0005152862,0.01499465,0.0002083226,0.00003100758,0.0003659688,0.0002438152,0.00002543189,0.0008718473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008052277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04258502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0318352520955604,"score_gpt":0.3422476924429703,"score_spread":0.3104124403474099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}