{"id":"W2776180143","doi":"","title":"Lies in Conversation: An Examination of Deception Using Automated Linguistic Analysis - eScholarship","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Communication source; Psychology; Deception; Ambivalence; Style (visual arts); Linguistics; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science; Literature; Art; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002778106,0.0001118679,0.0002314718,0.0002434234,0.0002100253,0.00002313522,0.0005023234,0.0001048429,0.00002582588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001759205,0.00008307095,0.0002246212,0.003580154,0.001870997,0.0003543914,0.0001240895,0.0001984724,0.000001797232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001104327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007199598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001158201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001088911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984819,0.00006764603,0.0004494388,0.0003159989,0.0004741726,0.0002108805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970092,0.00008503462,0.0008263491,0.0001321038,0.00190977,0.00003754244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002937287,0.0009371065,0.2095001,0.0001577915,0.000521183,2.487612e-7,0.4003672,0.001532446,0.3757972,0.005350296,0.00003296964,0.005509668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007759742,0.0001233545,0.8551373,0.000223013,0.0002364012,0.000005255236,0.09065957,0.001973046,0.04939282,0.001359745,0.00000192298,0.0001115815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965843,0.00001262229,0.00008825739,0.00007454019,0.0004431755,0.0002240197,0.00001414857,0.00003778849,0.002521139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990727,0.000002529589,0.0007738121,0.00007967445,0.00003143579,0.000005370214,9.716794e-7,0.000007027553,0.00002648189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6456372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6893765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0318352520955604,"score_gpt":0.3422476924429703,"score_spread":0.3104124403474099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}