{"id":"W2777282903","doi":"10.1190/geo2017-0183.1","title":"Estimating P- and S-wave inverse quality factors from observed seismic data using an attenuative elastic impedance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysics","topic":"Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Inverse problem; Inverse; Inversion (geology); Seismic inversion; Anelastic attenuation factor; Attenuation; Geology; Acoustic impedance; Bayesian probability; Seismic wave; Electrical impedance; Seismology; Statistics; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Geometry; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007081736,0.0005044881,0.0002501147,0.0006165507,0.0001592616,0.000555634,0.0004781795,0.0004472195,0.0005715815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003543584,0.0004123087,0.0003825588,0.0005438435,0.0004982672,0.0009863892,0.0005985168,0.0006820548,0.0001976513],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003565579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009405679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005770682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007240598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999775,0.00004248905,0.00001739734,0.0000486565,0.00009548091,0.00002101482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999437,0.0002826845,0.00009641823,0.00006418418,0.0001015632,0.00001818694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009423951,0.00008540235,0.01580806,0.0001008126,0.00005320593,0.00008605469,0.0001728159,0.8371077,0.0697734,0.004765634,0.0001843558,0.07176837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009061073,0.00001567107,0.002613871,0.000005368103,0.000008513098,0.00002209743,0.00001196541,0.987541,0.008324716,0.001233023,0.0001997636,0.00001483427],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09527764,0.0000206086,0.9038206,0.00004221498,0.000003132808,0.00002232554,0.00008078972,0.0001996202,0.0005329646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7126861,0.00009683333,0.2861395,0.00002199333,0.000007195045,0.00005685485,0.0003017594,0.00007895728,0.0006108301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005770682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01147419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2402608034043531,"score_gpt":0.325453737520861,"score_spread":0.08519293411650791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}