{"id":"W2778345604","doi":"10.1037/met0000112","title":"An alternative to post hoc model modification in confirmatory factor analysis: The Bayesian lasso.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Methods","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Residual; Covariance; Computer science; Bayesian probability; Covariance matrix; Overfitting; Mathematics; Statistics; Robustness (evolution); Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003152888,0.0002108323,0.0003983628,0.0002791885,0.0003782221,0.0001420125,0.001663542,0.0002320736,0.001048981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006052256,0.0001401822,0.0001285366,0.0003267064,0.000235802,0.0001615416,0.0001236546,0.0006412405,0.0001834284],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001037695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001979971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003719494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001578348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9948252,0.002959584,0.0004814318,0.0007859726,0.0003325636,0.0006152833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966266,0.0004732383,0.0002467414,0.002128699,0.0001163141,0.0004084804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001878623,0.00243947,0.03888243,0.00002754666,0.000507454,0.00007625626,0.01183465,0.001225069,0.006520149,0.06159003,0.0007696397,0.8742487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007561288,0.0006707406,0.9439463,0.000009046598,0.00004582721,0.000004190711,0.0006845181,0.04302287,0.0001783486,0.009246822,0.00117824,0.0002569362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6402778,0.0001240866,0.3295836,0.006791747,0.0005932088,0.001027722,0.00007921873,0.00006263192,0.02145998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241846,0.00002054607,0.07222177,0.002540563,0.00011543,0.0003472238,0.00001076832,0.00001734952,0.0005417278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998642,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.420004400219087,"score_gpt":0.6572029316560931,"score_spread":0.2371985314370061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}