{"id":"W2779469772","doi":"10.1017/s1743921318003587","title":"Reanalysis of LIGO black-hole coalescences with alternative prior assumptions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union","topic":"Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics; University of Toronto","funders":"Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"LIGO; Binary number; Bayesian probability; Baton rouge; Black hole (networking); Astrophysics; Physics; Astronomy; Computer science; History; Statistics; Mathematics; Gravitational wave; Art history; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001921748,0.00009497564,0.000155722,0.00007052083,0.0001583492,0.00009436237,0.00100091,0.00001843586,0.00009679447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000394353,0.00006391419,0.0001304066,0.00004738622,0.0003781833,0.000297431,0.0002551557,0.0001290104,0.00000583721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003608222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000437604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001665985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000378791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999087,0.000006355096,0.0002323075,0.0001746029,0.0003803942,0.0001193073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988089,0.0000428542,0.0005338018,0.000128411,0.0004416252,0.00004442779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001879379,0.0003743688,0.788053,0.00001863721,0.000670968,8.16893e-8,0.0002098861,0.001764401,0.04740613,0.15722,0.0006056157,0.003488996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001093102,0.0001344425,0.8346121,0.0002502868,0.00009190856,3.318798e-7,0.0007517976,0.01167072,0.1212948,0.02869994,0.001192942,0.0002075982],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894547,0.00000230296,0.0001632269,0.001787491,0.0000630847,0.0001184525,0.000177985,0.000001814107,0.008230982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953186,0.00000113819,0.001429898,0.000004319532,0.0001608921,0.000008676472,0.00002245842,0.000007308266,0.003046744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1285201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2606345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0143053398915311,"score_gpt":0.3065392042667778,"score_spread":0.2922338643752467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}