{"id":"W2780345459","doi":"10.1186/s12898-017-0155-7","title":"Estimating species pools for a single ecological assemblage","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan; Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Rare species; Range (aeronautics); Community; Relative species abundance; Species distribution; Rank abundance curve; Common species; Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Habitat; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003028145,0.0001045719,0.0001934179,0.00001619513,0.001136133,0.00004505945,0.0003214972,0.0001323515,0.001058405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001506392,0.00009381682,0.00006501134,0.00001906753,0.0004482868,0.0001435607,0.0003412887,0.00007665477,0.0003916914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001110613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000106194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008313249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005632218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991304,0.00004485445,0.0001773775,0.0002771914,0.00005277545,0.000317373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998948,0.0005591919,0.0001936441,0.0002443385,0.0000117339,0.0000430503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001583316,0.0001660432,0.989292,0.00001075292,0.00001448721,0.000008496911,0.00009485096,0.00190198,0.002153364,0.003893553,0.002131071,0.0003176304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000382579,0.0002481629,0.9739435,0.000001745416,0.00001550031,0.00001112951,0.00004209347,0.01572963,0.0001153372,0.008220213,0.001172137,0.0001180153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9278465,0.000004439378,0.006902653,0.0007577713,0.0007415915,0.0003367504,0.000005821595,0.00004388245,0.06336059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558983,0.000001371324,0.04017079,0.0002756633,0.00009278661,0.0001319298,0.000004531166,0.000007595402,0.003417032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05994356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05047581672385684,"score_gpt":0.2947390795687821,"score_spread":0.2442632628449253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}