{"id":"W2780350318","doi":"10.15611/pn.2017.485.02","title":"THE IMPACT OF EQUALIZING PART OF GENERAL SUBSIDY ON DISPERSION OF MUNICIPALITIES’ REVENUES IN POLAND","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu","topic":"Polish socio-economic development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Revenue; Dispersion (optics); Business; Economics; Natural resource economics; Finance; Market economy; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008439594,0.0001348498,0.0004228675,0.0008453514,0.0005869273,0.002287612,0.0004575874,0.000461081,0.004885004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006139043,0.0001410167,0.0003587537,0.00131826,0.0007749866,0.001073112,0.002424738,0.0005381923,0.0003194502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003903405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003136445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1135006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1337722,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990065,0.000188879,0.00007839518,0.0001647922,0.000162162,0.0003993179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985869,0.0002964106,0.0004462584,0.0001335678,0.0002779233,0.0002588707],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001580002,0.0003782024,0.7801962,0.0003762667,0.0005532954,0.002545817,0.005129488,0.02144894,0.002209487,0.05927837,0.01118997,0.1151139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008202674,0.0001862839,0.9607677,0.00009372663,0.0002041333,0.0001923703,0.008346924,0.007064134,0.0007485859,0.006858164,0.01543236,0.00002363483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928995,0.000372259,0.0002596207,0.0006665315,0.000007630861,0.00001310728,0.0002848653,0.00001488095,0.005481643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983993,0.0001278861,0.00007232907,0.00001938167,0.000003320765,0.000004076687,0.00009115599,0.000004127391,0.001278356],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1135006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2256799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0668549153098644,"score_gpt":0.3127895032042202,"score_spread":0.2459345878943558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}