{"id":"W2781327244","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.6","title":"Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Doctrine; Administrative law; Political science; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Judicial review; Common law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Project commissioning; High Court; Sociology; Publishing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001165684,0.00005673263,0.0001664138,0.000002735733,0.00125329,0.0001190625,0.0004733292,0.00002435162,0.0001742072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003172437,0.00003706645,0.00005608014,0.00005311881,0.0003537022,0.0001422163,0.00007360403,0.000106636,0.00002580047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002275669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001025062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01747351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0618725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991434,0.0001729811,0.0002294091,0.0001204432,0.0001978682,0.0001358582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991984,0.0001228443,0.0002283886,0.0003455282,0.00006847636,0.00003630721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001147978,0.00001286291,0.0002980433,0.00008254236,0.000002202753,3.658349e-7,0.0002789164,2.240021e-7,0.000006994441,0.9960883,0.0001179233,0.003110536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001509392,0.00005712806,0.003167206,0.001650836,0.00002157207,3.921405e-7,0.0002366281,0.0000127056,0.00009015404,0.02105666,0.9734299,0.0001259462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01058397,0.006448564,0.000007737801,0.02777841,0.00004354424,0.0007383728,0.0000102015,0.00001240914,0.9543768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939114,0.003986213,0.0002220976,0.001157281,0.00005713454,0.00009084601,0.000001451151,0.000002604061,0.0005709781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2729267636078582,"score_gpt":0.5032675907602394,"score_spread":0.2303408271523812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}