{"id":"W2781327244","doi":"10.22145/flr.45.4.6","title":"Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Law; Doctrine; Administrative law; Political science; Statutory law; Principle of legality; Judicial review; Common law; Standard of review; Statutory interpretation; Discretion; Project commissioning; High Court; Sociology; Publishing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04298605,0.0003711119,0.0009787878,0.005293773,0.005560027,0.01161119,0.003746162,0.007488395,0.002509568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07108101,0.0004780047,0.0008203545,0.002673718,0.03145259,0.009840304,0.005799938,0.0114129,0.0004710607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01831295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02121864,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0851214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07697459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9647372,0.01621193,0.001368958,0.001372602,0.01302897,0.003280325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9042026,0.06563785,0.003282625,0.004598863,0.02044665,0.001831333],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001417175,0.0000158964,0.0003161005,0.00008421348,0.000008215851,0.0001605495,0.003463069,0.0003320085,0.00008857191,0.9841312,0.003492428,0.007893595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043219,0.0001293896,0.003833896,0.001937985,0.0000709933,0.0003270227,0.006516934,0.0027864,0.000680557,0.7815584,0.2020092,0.0001059722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1322197,0.06959441,0.04206462,0.2721146,0.004818606,0.0002204383,0.0001014216,0.0001091445,0.4787571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615943,0.005721072,0.004621169,0.0156255,0.001406768,0.00005478554,0.00001772381,0.00003044463,0.01092822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0851214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2273347,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2729267636078582,"score_gpt":0.5032675907602394,"score_spread":0.2303408271523812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}