{"id":"W2781643775","doi":"10.16997/jdd.69","title":"Action planning to improve issues of effectiveness, representation and scale in public participation: A conference report","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Transparency (behavior); Public participation; Action (physics); Deliberative democracy; Institutionalisation; Scale (ratio); Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Participatory action research; Management science; Democracy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2486071,0.00146857,0.0010344,0.00365738,0.01081199,0.01860208,0.004727864,0.00533634,0.01109412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2051853,0.0009839057,0.001068114,0.004099069,0.008787565,0.01907924,0.01724954,0.008987679,0.001678061],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009472438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02680796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003503031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002259377,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7010229,0.2248726,0.01262552,0.006600593,0.04592711,0.008951215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.664377,0.2577672,0.01275633,0.01581211,0.04308345,0.006203787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004552375,0.0007632684,0.006384006,0.004779341,0.0001609847,0.0005167907,0.1014501,0.008268048,0.001967768,0.2599846,0.07740921,0.5378606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003065214,0.001388763,0.006073074,0.004189321,0.0001890849,0.0007761365,0.1177654,0.008192511,0.01539158,0.1245579,0.7207184,0.0004512422],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1003173,0.01362689,0.3578804,0.2239076,0.00636269,0.008881095,0.0005492115,0.001721897,0.286753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7460642,0.007439159,0.1851131,0.006424161,0.001123859,0.01019323,0.0006297909,0.0007796707,0.04223284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2486071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9266012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07197954559128268,"score_gpt":0.3657453087776514,"score_spread":0.2937657631863688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}