{"id":"W2781747296","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.026","title":"Wetlands, Flood Control and Ecosystem Services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A Case Study in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; Flood control; Flood myth; Environmental science; Damages; Flood mitigation; Detention basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecosystem; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Flooding (psychology); Environmental resource management; Water resource management; Geography; Ecology; Surface runoff; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005799682,0.0003935431,0.0004506892,0.001499468,0.004971679,0.002058873,0.001599106,0.0009383667,0.001654597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001707538,0.000413804,0.0005076153,0.004900504,0.002660359,0.0007608613,0.001541776,0.0008167318,0.0001200641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05427879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992794,0.0001465113,0.00003261314,0.00006471489,0.0001258114,0.0003508986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987368,0.0003493435,0.0001400892,0.00004710904,0.0004115754,0.0003150972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002242382,0.0003796261,0.9544196,0.0001305247,0.0002252361,0.004920191,0.01038434,0.004237219,0.00127784,0.003167196,0.002656949,0.01797691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004705399,0.00007687497,0.9252418,0.0001133167,0.0001200952,0.000620344,0.06523076,0.004395231,0.0003797971,0.0008294263,0.002876132,0.00006927003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973595,0.0001516241,0.00005661998,0.0002444063,0.000002536377,0.00002932111,0.0002946703,0.000003063355,0.001858375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979094,0.0002552638,0.000208268,0.00007174138,0.000001428917,0.00001364483,0.0001555676,0.000003324936,0.001381409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05427879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.393822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006384755467326371,"score_gpt":0.1867596895276952,"score_spread":0.1803749340603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}