{"id":"W2781747296","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.026","title":"Wetlands, Flood Control and Ecosystem Services in the Smith Creek Drainage Basin: A Case Study in Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ducks Unlimited Canada; University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Wetland; Ecosystem services; Flood control; Flood myth; Environmental science; Damages; Flood mitigation; Detention basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecosystem; Structural basin; Drainage basin; Flooding (psychology); Environmental resource management; Water resource management; Geography; Ecology; Surface runoff; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007998455,0.0001558796,0.0003143854,0.00002142837,0.0001678456,0.0001127951,0.000315892,0.00008109557,0.0003711158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000719022,0.0001047701,0.00002208172,0.0001037525,0.00002360612,0.0001705105,0.0001429146,0.0001279049,0.00004407715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002596682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005494228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6219986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998619,0.000207508,0.0003713211,0.0003881764,0.00006760512,0.0003464408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993197,0.0002489937,0.0001015228,0.0002388081,0.000004206835,0.00008676323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002667911,0.000200963,0.9947643,0.0000210086,0.00001262243,0.001134292,0.003039224,0.0003412239,7.214855e-7,0.00000355611,0.00008221595,0.0003731918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002048312,0.0004540553,0.9029189,0.00001152407,0.00001703074,0.0003788457,0.0717329,0.02015657,0.000001312983,0.0001369825,0.001917106,0.000226471],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966633,0.00001535099,6.847571e-7,0.0002974179,0.0001137463,0.0006570144,0.00003308465,0.00001063705,0.002208732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984001,0.000005049739,0.00001739666,0.001412737,0.00007313467,0.00006584312,0.000001966958,0.000007259413,0.00001652239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3778602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4272402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006384755467326371,"score_gpt":0.1867596895276952,"score_spread":0.1803749340603688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}