{"id":"W2782712271","doi":"10.1111/nrm.12156","title":"A guide to calculating habitat‐quality metrics to inform conservation of highly mobile species","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural Resource Modeling","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis","keywords":"Occupancy; Metric (unit); Habitat; Computer science; Centrality; Quality (philosophy); Resource (disambiguation); Graph; Data science; Data quality; Data mining; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Statistics; Theoretical computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004527875,0.002955194,0.001362402,0.008161307,0.0009501278,0.0035333,0.004123291,0.002749912,0.05500127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03050661,0.001652175,0.001747834,0.007228379,0.001112488,0.004225863,0.002061362,0.004501448,0.04430819],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001343072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00284256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007987912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01311555,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976391,0.0007785452,0.0004175499,0.0002136086,0.0008882137,0.00006300749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836414,0.008539661,0.0008100628,0.001128865,0.005485154,0.0003949021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004492709,0.0001892079,0.001612884,0.001500114,0.0000677899,0.0004466596,0.0005565112,0.00827495,0.002738552,0.05866814,0.595201,0.3306993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003878086,0.00008150742,0.001316456,0.001363968,0.00002290068,0.0005257636,0.0002628519,0.01781038,0.001430863,0.07072403,0.9062771,0.0001454854],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001429318,0.004636729,0.9225518,0.004164155,0.001141714,0.00128158,0.01503918,0.01541031,0.03434534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003555594,0.003992525,0.9677244,0.001081839,0.0001966502,0.001290989,0.0044482,0.002102176,0.01560759],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05500127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1839976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05712934691262329,"score_gpt":0.3309234665795291,"score_spread":0.2737941196669059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}