{"id":"W2782820487","doi":"10.1175/jcli-d-16-0752.1","title":"Revising Return Periods for Record Events in a Climate Event Attribution Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Climate","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Counterfactual thinking; Context (archaeology); Event (particle physics); Econometrics; Computer science; Extreme value theory; Inference; Climate model; Rare events; Variable (mathematics); Climate change; Statistical hypothesis testing; Statistical inference; Sample (material); Climatology; Statistics; Geography; Psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01396967,0.0006020864,0.0007618887,0.005014217,0.001300915,0.004743184,0.002271105,0.001372629,0.005752524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09652352,0.000525966,0.001045806,0.00515955,0.001216146,0.007072774,0.002688489,0.002611707,0.0006038371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001519872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001499366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004962033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004076008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9949575,0.002067219,0.0006458163,0.001210006,0.0007664856,0.000353007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9501902,0.03346727,0.006675764,0.005580507,0.002994766,0.001091503],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00157508,0.0004546927,0.2368053,0.0006253868,0.0003899972,0.001276469,0.005415579,0.1487771,0.004805108,0.1696126,0.006303901,0.4239588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001391797,0.0004614313,0.1569619,0.0003984649,0.0003031601,0.0008026601,0.003811692,0.6455557,0.005862905,0.159388,0.02606716,0.0002477241],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3355547,0.001240133,0.6478201,0.00207451,0.0006065174,0.0002854496,0.001832247,0.0009911866,0.009595306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.906118,0.0003714863,0.09106751,0.0001097983,0.0002890014,0.0001334327,0.000816508,0.0001754782,0.0009187568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01396967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0738796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03159498095115112,"score_gpt":0.3113608988530908,"score_spread":0.2797659179019397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}