{"id":"W2783076493","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0010.7921","title":"ANIMAL WELFARE AS A PUBLIC GOOD IN POLISH OPINION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Public economics; Agriculture; Public opinion; Public good; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Sample (material); Public interest; Business; Demographic economics; Political science; Market economy; Geography; Politics; Biology; Microeconomics; Law; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00320598,0.000118754,0.0002066767,0.0009846827,0.0009867544,0.004127975,0.0001651884,0.0009343228,0.002281407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006372341,0.0001195424,0.0001787695,0.0009974607,0.003738886,0.002579428,0.001378074,0.00129391,0.0001861405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003295555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00108499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00488388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003884235,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984403,0.0006969255,0.0001024534,0.0001446625,0.0003387124,0.0002769279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969851,0.001338009,0.0008584328,0.0001165867,0.0005016616,0.0002001895],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005009507,0.000318185,0.1963638,0.001177426,0.0002003159,0.002629933,0.09442196,0.001357338,0.004145568,0.5491944,0.02467517,0.1250151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005195469,0.0002487727,0.4988046,0.0009977821,0.0001131494,0.000779656,0.09845455,0.002163904,0.0010436,0.1069402,0.2903204,0.00008142569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8402456,0.009920643,0.001416822,0.05938945,0.0002171768,0.00003806648,0.000196525,0.000006779302,0.08856896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958099,0.001724115,0.00006854924,0.001068705,0.00007533193,0.000003746205,0.00002013538,0.000001604436,0.001227873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00488388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02391106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06769480856461951,"score_gpt":0.2351385972130216,"score_spread":0.1674437886484021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}