{"id":"W2783076493","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0010.7921","title":"ANIMAL WELFARE AS A PUBLIC GOOD IN POLISH OPINION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Public economics; Agriculture; Public opinion; Public good; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Sample (material); Public interest; Business; Demographic economics; Political science; Market economy; Geography; Politics; Biology; Microeconomics; Law; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004745207,0.0001389375,0.0003694378,0.00008455909,0.0001087952,0.000053539,0.0002184574,0.0001353118,0.0001991949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001928655,0.0001099133,0.0001205089,0.0001990486,0.0000834864,0.0005725612,0.0001195033,0.00007922083,0.00004608371],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001385034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001374174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002923436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998736,0.00002854928,0.0006834932,0.0002520475,0.00004322878,0.0002566709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985918,0.00003473649,0.001083992,0.0001400731,0.00009299554,0.00005635677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001167163,0.0001156317,0.8999552,0.00003459797,0.00006789029,2.97132e-8,0.0003922939,0.00003048204,0.0001198693,0.09607407,0.002944063,0.0002542444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004321678,0.00005474514,0.9900507,0.00002400695,0.000003471195,0.000001598847,0.000194198,0.00002481391,0.0007501231,0.002746047,0.005567988,0.0001501608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570824,0.0002438301,6.473206e-7,0.03273729,0.0003271702,0.0001621905,0.000197227,0.000008027356,0.009241215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984172,0.0003179268,0.00001274254,0.0002917094,0.0002281755,0.000009740852,0.00004850659,0.000007040038,0.0006669406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09332802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4482133,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06769480856461951,"score_gpt":0.2351385972130216,"score_spread":0.1674437886484021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}