{"id":"W2783138639","doi":"10.1002/cjce.23138","title":"Effect of magnetic field on the ammonia‐based CO<sub>2</sub> absorption process","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flue gas; Absorption (acoustics); Magnetic field; Ammonia; Absorption efficiency; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Chemistry; Materials science; Aqueous solution; Volumetric flow rate; Composite material; Thermodynamics; Environmental chemistry; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001478006,0.000221605,0.0002299799,0.0001316466,0.0001858674,0.0002114853,0.0001619601,0.000194247,0.0007962784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003965748,0.000129085,0.0001155439,0.0001147013,0.0002534776,0.0003182222,0.0001330717,0.000179203,0.0001411369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002472246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001541422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001488487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001885605,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998891,0.0000190799,0.000006377377,0.00001727077,0.0000352554,0.00003278449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998375,0.0000732247,0.00002885078,0.000008095983,0.00003819776,0.00001416879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003333366,0.00002085139,0.0004063457,0.0001260201,0.000007146179,0.00006676497,0.00002400932,0.000207098,0.9960382,0.00003182846,0.00006035978,0.00267808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001144419,0.0002164688,0.002733761,0.000003923438,0.00001844788,0.00004637249,0.00002226817,0.001305519,0.9950935,0.00001262699,0.0005309163,0.00000480535],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974602,0.0005355513,0.0008292728,0.0000533161,0.00001770201,0.000009877152,0.00003263048,0.00005243738,0.001009017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989871,0.0002278464,0.0004273237,0.00001758772,0.000006571625,0.000004235909,0.00002317038,0.000006602532,0.0002995354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001488487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002959669,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004197145545686621,"score_gpt":0.1860724569234036,"score_spread":0.181875311377717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}