{"id":"W2783731457","doi":"10.1515/phys-2017-0112","title":"Field-based optimal-design of an electric motor: a new sensitivity formulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Physics","topic":"Electric Motor Design and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Optimal design; Switched reluctance motor; Isotropy; Multi-objective optimization; Electric motor; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Control theory (sociology); Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Electronic engineering; Mechanical engineering; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001705811,0.0001087766,0.0002049684,0.00003367431,0.0001150123,0.0001442674,0.0002882403,0.00005207364,0.00001629921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003109127,0.0001116911,0.00005998162,0.0001165588,0.000005035996,0.0004896641,0.00002389578,0.00008650145,0.000007709685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000286154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005596847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003555663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001025982,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994399,0.000034962,0.0001234847,0.0001307581,0.0001161433,0.0001547299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992606,0.00007445566,0.00008353905,0.0004779124,0.00003915451,0.00006432329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008862161,0.00009598429,0.0001857702,0.00003115498,0.0001024726,0.000007859472,0.00008579438,0.1893626,0.3833123,0.0006243124,0.001107426,0.4249957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000283691,0.0001322642,0.000469976,0.000009906626,0.00003319747,3.622716e-7,7.432254e-7,0.8251307,0.1731421,0.00063922,0.00004264745,0.0001152132],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06755573,0.00001435256,0.9299819,0.00002811695,0.00003173753,0.0002848399,0.000002712523,0.00005002302,0.002050514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774902,0.00000661603,0.02214251,0.00002639702,0.0001001379,0.000006183656,0.000007595423,0.00001907199,0.000201286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4554633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0278720320833408,"score_gpt":0.2658506461045892,"score_spread":0.2379786140212485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}