{"id":"W2783984054","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.13056","title":"Effects of habitat quality and access management on the density of a recovering grizzly bear population","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of Alberta","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations; Panthera","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Threatened species; Population density; Geography; Habitat; Population; Wilderness area; Wildlife management; Wilderness; Population size; Wildlife; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Mark and recapture; Distance sampling; Ursus; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013131,0.0001433297,0.0002127688,0.0003286134,0.0001637591,0.0003581189,0.0004194221,0.0002208842,0.001461673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004053595,0.00009753992,0.0003363108,0.0002481754,0.0004174594,0.0003853413,0.0003415831,0.0002542681,0.0001020816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003172891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001346287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005531476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008774003,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993629,0.0003034746,0.00004354279,0.0001153895,0.0001174624,0.00005731287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961424,0.001659753,0.00134898,0.0002783522,0.0002749676,0.0002954381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006785027,0.0002311653,0.9815508,0.00004711153,0.0001930751,0.0001508084,0.0001369306,0.00160812,0.006129677,0.00006294728,0.0001558544,0.009055007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003121193,0.0003032276,0.9984464,0.00000238063,0.00002468014,0.00003858317,0.00005196267,0.0006495074,0.000408844,0.00001749198,0.00005138703,0.000002301426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995055,0.00007550543,0.000123867,0.0000223216,0.00000184772,0.000004684379,0.00004978273,0.000003522056,0.0002129335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997963,0.00001650597,0.00007528878,0.00001041269,0.000001807083,0.000003287356,0.00004359297,7.223512e-7,0.00005220914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005531476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01099861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01516304503967899,"score_gpt":0.2581191270818922,"score_spread":0.2429560820422132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}