{"id":"W2783984054","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.13056","title":"Effects of habitat quality and access management on the density of a recovering grizzly bear population","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Forests; University of Alberta","funders":"Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations; Panthera","keywords":"Grizzly Bears; Threatened species; Population density; Geography; Habitat; Population; Wilderness area; Wildlife management; Wilderness; Population size; Wildlife; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Mark and recapture; Distance sampling; Ursus; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006480524,0.0000498071,0.0001557043,0.00003358267,0.00006750737,0.000004008186,0.0001260916,0.00004809397,0.00007653786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005288711,0.00003624531,0.00002580396,0.00007477159,0.0001530445,0.00007700282,0.0000998906,0.00008037999,0.000007438964],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004975123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003921374,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002649532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002770659,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999392,0.00006885527,0.0002785824,0.0000791238,0.0001007836,0.00008070179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991611,0.0002865444,0.0004423007,0.00007609487,0.00001325168,0.00002066608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000297894,0.00007292772,0.9924814,0.0000310393,0.00003735015,0.000002178694,0.0001319184,0.000128621,0.002405233,0.002123843,0.000339959,0.001947697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003053232,0.000238359,0.9874749,0.000008419071,0.00002557601,0.000003658675,0.00003544091,0.00002697434,0.003992012,0.007832599,0.00002522698,0.00003153406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976011,0.000001611653,0.0001031899,0.000518995,0.000130589,0.0001562806,2.725149e-7,0.000001711255,0.001486248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989424,0.00001102713,0.0004192426,0.0005855786,0.00002677373,0.000003132385,2.451802e-7,0.00000251858,0.00000905894],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005708756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1478041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01516304503967899,"score_gpt":0.2581191270818922,"score_spread":0.2429560820422132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}