{"id":"W2784004281","doi":"10.1017/s002193201700061x","title":"UNPACKING THE DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF FAMILY PLANNING POLICIES IN CHINA: ANALYSIS OF PARITY PROGRESSION RATIOS FROM RETROSPECTIVE BIRTH HISTORY DATA, 1971–2005","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biosocial Science","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Family planning policy; Family planning; Socioeconomic status; Fertility; China; Parity (physics); One-child policy; Demography; Population; Geography; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002001507,0.000236084,0.0002310952,0.001720868,0.0003821946,0.000440445,0.0004077647,0.0001663365,0.0004706198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003343695,0.0002270912,0.0003796557,0.002468921,0.0003753834,0.0003363879,0.0005073671,0.0002982517,0.00006986644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001023094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001221287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09893462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993893,0.0001451912,0.0001010435,0.0001321817,0.0001191935,0.0001131468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980223,0.0003864246,0.0009027421,0.0003121508,0.0002465654,0.0001297868],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001139724,0.0000036699,0.9967783,0.000006969202,0.00003687935,0.00003430362,0.0001815397,0.0001120579,0.0001014894,0.00005066445,0.00004857737,0.002634102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.166434e-7,0.000007003614,0.9994368,0.000002519251,0.00001125519,0.00002038155,0.00009678644,0.0002019366,0.00004976549,0.000009325724,0.0001625076,0.000001288392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986637,0.0002227224,0.0001349637,0.00004016602,0.000002708936,0.000005669329,0.0006187941,0.000002558788,0.0003088104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990187,0.0001073403,0.00008642321,0.00001076701,0.000002935402,0.00000411376,0.0006545965,9.961138e-7,0.0001140589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09893462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1967175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0837212400012859,"score_gpt":0.4073000764165527,"score_spread":0.3235788364152668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}