{"id":"W2784004281","doi":"10.1017/s002193201700061x","title":"UNPACKING THE DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF FAMILY PLANNING POLICIES IN CHINA: ANALYSIS OF PARITY PROGRESSION RATIOS FROM RETROSPECTIVE BIRTH HISTORY DATA, 1971–2005","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Biosocial Science","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Global Health Research","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Family planning policy; Family planning; Socioeconomic status; Fertility; China; Parity (physics); One-child policy; Demography; Population; Geography; Total fertility rate; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002780401,0.0001098393,0.0004334001,0.0006582449,0.0004898187,0.00007378629,0.001303426,0.00007756357,0.0001063293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004008985,0.00006719541,0.0002145583,0.002525988,0.003151625,0.0006581143,0.0001735423,0.0002307726,2.139218e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004050319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001328243,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02051783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01629679,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973601,0.0003076874,0.0005374605,0.0002044006,0.001256492,0.0003338412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980125,0.0001271972,0.001190833,0.0002365713,0.0003204404,0.0001124892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006464515,0.0001095546,0.9078489,0.000001646434,0.000204791,0.000001203699,0.08000416,0.00001568798,0.005533262,0.0006012638,0.0003320283,0.00528284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001611496,0.000150068,0.990724,0.00005117181,0.0001307454,1.799054e-7,0.007274484,0.0002705815,0.0001166758,0.0009285246,0.0001153553,0.00007704252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970552,0.0004871363,0.0001339522,0.0002728488,0.0004702268,0.00007193226,0.00006621629,0.000005673113,0.001436769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993167,0.0001180219,0.0001283364,0.00001230947,0.0004078778,4.545097e-7,0.000002287268,0.000002862686,0.00001117409],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0828751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0837212400012859,"score_gpt":0.4073000764165527,"score_spread":0.3235788364152668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}