{"id":"W2784066897","doi":"10.1002/wsb.848","title":"Assessment of repeat‐visit surveys as a viable method for estimating brood abundance at the 10.4‐km <sup>2</sup> scale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Delta Waterfowl; U.S. Geological Survey; South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks","keywords":"Pothole (geology); Brood; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Geography; Wetland; Ecology; Productivity; Scale (ratio); Wildlife management; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005154192,0.0002336197,0.0003167642,0.00001094034,0.0009129977,0.00003678842,0.0004604688,0.0002151536,0.009416213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000406013,0.0001937494,0.0002846778,0.0002565235,0.0006228178,0.00009774094,0.0003944395,0.0002120446,0.0008078563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003113911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007007631,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005650842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000876866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974139,0.0006408335,0.0004754382,0.0005841703,0.0004089478,0.0004767129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977353,0.001221863,0.0003270172,0.0005512186,0.00007141269,0.00009318732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003910948,0.0001916195,0.3676802,0.00005686775,0.0001165077,7.209555e-7,0.002300102,0.01010076,0.0006491676,0.0001186013,0.6148421,0.003904246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001517012,0.0005475797,0.4102253,0.00008450235,0.0001335852,0.00002445626,0.001172843,0.2976593,0.0006803901,0.0008846223,0.2865357,0.0005346856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7799093,0.00003842408,0.1866275,0.02202147,0.0002446543,0.001132043,0.00005611,0.0001160501,0.009854492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1937813,0.00001699694,0.7613528,0.01434937,0.0005220147,0.0003439378,0.00008033598,0.00006785814,0.02948539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.586128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999701,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01183279939698213,"score_gpt":0.2810214070575386,"score_spread":0.2691886076605565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}