{"id":"W2784066897","doi":"10.1002/wsb.848","title":"Assessment of repeat‐visit surveys as a viable method for estimating brood abundance at the 10.4‐km <sup>2</sup> scale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wildlife Society Bulletin","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Delta Waterfowl; U.S. Geological Survey; South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks","keywords":"Pothole (geology); Brood; Abundance (ecology); Wildlife; Geography; Wetland; Ecology; Productivity; Scale (ratio); Wildlife management; Environmental science; Biology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008813645,0.000522471,0.0004037771,0.0007549389,0.0003525085,0.001109644,0.001226484,0.0006134859,0.001416505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01617125,0.0004589368,0.0006169801,0.0005616546,0.0004357429,0.00111741,0.0009156583,0.0004406644,0.00036805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008720788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009266607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03430356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1245404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967493,0.002188576,0.00009679563,0.0004516437,0.0004005645,0.0001130723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849082,0.007130827,0.004035842,0.001464059,0.002052336,0.0004087087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002393083,0.0001266999,0.9452809,0.00008195887,0.0002949978,0.00006706407,0.0002198632,0.01356961,0.004919655,0.0003028474,0.0006744869,0.03422253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003923551,0.00106318,0.7456623,0.00007038147,0.0002231945,0.0002241498,0.0004946594,0.2466261,0.003365814,0.0007183612,0.001447964,0.00006470274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323959,0.0002136935,0.06302457,0.000268955,0.00002152349,0.0001760724,0.0009291013,0.0003311022,0.002639197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96061,0.0000441917,0.03840445,0.00003644721,0.000008090692,0.00009152787,0.0003677747,0.00001942771,0.0004179342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03430356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06820774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01183279939698213,"score_gpt":0.2810214070575386,"score_spread":0.2691886076605565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}