{"id":"W2784280003","doi":"","title":"Thermodynamics of CO2 absorption in aqueous ethanolamine solutions: experimental study of the enthalpy of solution by flow calorimetry","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Diethanolamine; Chemistry; Enthalpy; Aqueous solution; Thermodynamics; Amine gas treating; Standard enthalpy of reaction; Enthalpy of vaporization; Equilibrium constant; Alkanolamine; Calorimetry; Ethanolamine; Enthalpy of mixing; Enthalpy change of solution; Physical chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005262418,0.0004504441,0.0004218372,0.000386781,0.0004130209,0.0004701862,0.0005321307,0.000553589,0.001663008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008523331,0.0002188267,0.0003321531,0.0004331312,0.0008291079,0.0006384483,0.0002654248,0.001162761,0.0002730414],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006669412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003357358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002482316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001826175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997187,0.00004327545,0.00001407907,0.00007545249,0.00009038675,0.00005809425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996005,0.0002358002,0.00003868524,0.00003395155,0.00007547156,0.00001568013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005142944,0.00006734063,0.0009844353,0.000139748,0.00002330202,0.0000464005,0.0001327968,0.001009974,0.9925328,0.00057138,0.0001414917,0.003836109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007198405,0.00008416499,0.00185516,0.000003637514,0.00000567777,0.00001980533,0.0000248969,0.00221471,0.9953873,0.00007005627,0.0003189601,0.000008500411],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905529,0.001001341,0.005456583,0.0001141357,0.00004002874,0.0000425254,0.0004596462,0.00006499345,0.002267948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997458,0.000393179,0.0009702824,0.00003256596,0.000014214,0.00003327252,0.0002211406,0.00001920399,0.0008580865],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002482316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005563259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0131497063040786,"score_gpt":0.2147568275115299,"score_spread":0.2016071212074513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}