{"id":"W2785005020","doi":"10.33524/cjar.v18i2.334","title":"USING A CRITICAL REFLECTION FRAMEWORK AND COLLABORATIVE INQUIRY TO IMPROVE TEACHING PRACTICE: AN ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Action Research","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action research; Critical reflection; Reflection (computer programming); Action learning; Psychology; Process (computing); Pedagogy; Action (physics); Reflective practice; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Cooperative learning; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02406801,0.00007608037,0.0001171067,0.0009893805,0.006642083,0.0008663815,0.0002660167,0.0001608972,0.00007585438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03303197,0.00006181104,0.00002347193,0.001642486,0.002100314,0.001097364,0.00002589655,0.002438857,0.00001497631],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001864515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008944933,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1239646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3345358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990039,0.007824311,0.0002225604,0.0002000636,0.001089599,0.000624503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922291,0.00210422,0.00009579067,0.0001709944,0.004770687,0.0006292296],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002764314,0.00006714198,0.0004705971,0.00001350396,0.00004492016,0.000007904559,0.9503152,0.000002651405,0.001738242,0.01439733,0.01374575,0.01892033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007291615,0.0006896479,0.00100745,0.00006462898,0.00001155768,0.00002482793,0.8314334,0.00001933527,0.0002181225,0.002673713,0.163717,0.00006744773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6284976,0.0003799782,0.00110144,0.3589285,0.003279598,0.0009685886,0.000003946689,0.0000214431,0.006818934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911758,0.00004550705,0.003324281,0.0003219198,0.004753414,0.00001361657,2.028535e-7,0.00001294121,0.0003523302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3626782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998626,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8033362993287048,"score_gpt":0.7089591791302645,"score_spread":0.09437712019844025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}