{"id":"W2785562296","doi":"10.1002/ccd.26980","title":"One‐year outcomes after successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: The impact of dissection re‐entry techniques","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","topic":"Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Conventional PCI; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Clinical endpoint; Revascularization; Canadian Cardiovascular Society; Surgery; Myocardial infarction; Dissection (medical); Angina; Percutaneous; Cardiology; Internal medicine; Randomized controlled trial","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033276,0.0002151411,0.0004603886,0.0001414311,0.000451435,0.0001443411,0.0001917125,0.0001232228,0.0008722549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001766746,0.0001619491,0.0035242,0.00008454912,0.0002664554,0.0002615128,0.0002718129,0.0001863728,0.0000115406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000139444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004201805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002399229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005302614,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985305,0.0001271518,0.000535676,0.0003237978,0.000291908,0.000190955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998278,0.00003503397,0.0002378046,0.001109169,0.0002401739,0.00009982836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000681427,0.002953423,0.8020455,0.001690933,0.008006265,0.0002815421,0.0007635908,0.0001605499,0.002611537,0.0005349437,0.000436316,0.1798339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001011617,0.001180071,0.9929682,0.00157801,0.001109463,0.0007347681,0.0002914263,0.0002286316,0.000409281,0.0001197525,0.0001745863,0.0001942047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841957,0.002860209,0.01059529,0.0002704824,0.000293293,0.0007280507,0.0001060868,0.00007599839,0.0008748606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978431,0.0008221763,0.0001202402,0.00001305123,0.0001254431,0.00009082164,0.0001331485,0.00003175765,0.0008202494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1909226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955058,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01776160744822389,"score_gpt":0.3124828482877668,"score_spread":0.2947212408395429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}