{"id":"W2785953012","doi":"10.1142/s0218194017400083","title":"Comparing Software Bugs in Clone and Non-clone Code: An Empirical Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"clone (Java method); Software maintenance; Cloning (programming); Commit; Code (set theory); Code refactoring; Computer science; Software bug; Programming language; Source code; Software; Software engineering; Software system; Biology; Database; Genetics; Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001096283,0.0003496073,0.0005389564,0.0008778195,0.0001118498,0.0007444239,0.001800418,0.0001228226,0.00000241284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003284704,0.0003609371,0.00007868866,0.000197792,0.0000464107,0.001449099,0.0008394091,0.0008222065,0.000003639868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001969241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001015179,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003506296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000165854,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978528,0.00002964867,0.0006482856,0.0004365326,0.0005875506,0.0004452005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977612,0.0007384567,0.0001912094,0.0005396137,0.0004028056,0.0003666715],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003426023,0.0003584868,0.9421033,0.0001124737,0.0002129045,0.0006626354,0.00367357,0.04091204,0.0006366604,0.00007012951,0.00004576999,0.01117779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001759717,0.0002495385,0.7969296,0.000422924,0.00001338067,0.0003681621,0.00004924975,0.1992424,0.0002288054,0.00002026835,0.000333479,0.0003824526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7050426,0.0007022598,0.2926036,0.00006370484,0.001314136,0.0001149979,0.000002526853,0.000152823,0.000003402111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9504856,0.00007829317,0.04890239,0.00000671778,0.0004412893,0.00001287879,0.000001393305,0.0000507659,0.00002061154],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2454431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.030350166117151,"score_gpt":0.3279352734788712,"score_spread":0.2975851073617202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}