{"id":"W2786065855","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1802.04770","title":"Counterexamples to quasiconcavity for the heat equation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Counterexample; Heat equation; Subharmonic; Construct (python library); Heat flow; Regular polygon; Mathematics; Mechanics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical economics; Thermodynamics; Physics; Computer science; Geometry; Discrete mathematics; Thermal; Nonlinear system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007699469,0.0002742603,0.0004090528,0.0002234433,0.0002616302,0.000110284,0.0007568094,0.0002668483,0.0001858422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005948462,0.0002189431,0.0003924601,0.0006473752,0.00007744701,0.00008505048,0.0004990553,0.0002811369,0.0000886273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001907544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009226451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002421507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003874977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986129,0.00008639609,0.0002352799,0.0006550828,0.0001216624,0.0002886286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997101,0.00114996,0.0001829548,0.001015469,0.0004409855,0.0001095954],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004757286,0.0006621614,0.005912109,0.0007589874,0.002409368,0.00002626193,0.00185773,0.08094121,0.00006536346,0.7959882,0.1080373,0.002865527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001032228,0.0002413682,0.002715652,0.0002000688,0.002501354,0.000001818406,0.001273597,0.3648272,0.000151589,0.582028,0.04396531,0.001061772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2895481,0.00005090593,0.708083,0.0002421541,0.0004109623,0.0007562506,0.00007108619,0.00006907573,0.000768488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995239,0.00004361359,0.001604127,0.0001880855,0.0003528986,0.000007168696,0.00004107771,0.00002736884,0.002496665],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7064789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8928239,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2694635382306858,"score_gpt":0.2548495773672747,"score_spread":0.01461396086341105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}