{"id":"W2786118451","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0190614","title":"The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary","keywords":"Psychology; Gaze; Attentional bias; Eye tracking; Cognitive psychology; Lottery; Eye movement; Cognition; Psychiatry; Neuroscience; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003788773,0.0001909602,0.0002245463,0.0005244454,0.0001784492,0.0001827339,0.0001156723,0.0003053192,0.001388273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001980202,0.0001425484,0.00013014,0.0001813507,0.0002287283,0.0002567544,0.0002488593,0.0002442771,0.000127405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001250758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001000318,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001778571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003021908,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998306,0.00003594361,0.00001034537,0.00005036283,0.00004215286,0.00003050032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993777,0.0002485064,0.0001512398,0.00006366087,0.0001042352,0.00005473087],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003401853,0.001219056,0.247392,0.0001344991,0.00009655023,0.0003294396,0.002263661,0.0002278807,0.6954413,0.0002415042,0.0002919759,0.04896028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003001486,0.0007297584,0.9885764,0.000007203043,0.00002285314,0.0003811822,0.0002060285,0.0006879544,0.009007254,0.0001236129,0.0002172619,0.00001056456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985812,0.00007984816,0.0007286907,0.000009844508,0.000002980953,0.00003573579,0.00003952299,0.000005445304,0.0005168622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986991,0.00005809242,0.0006935697,0.00002663231,0.000004838079,0.00004223735,0.00006067978,0.000003794813,0.0004110595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001778571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004644275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4887796069201365,"score_gpt":0.4654317340712426,"score_spread":0.02334787284889389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}