{"id":"W2786118451","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0190614","title":"The specificity of attentional biases by type of gambling: An eye-tracking study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary","keywords":"Psychology; Gaze; Attentional bias; Eye tracking; Cognitive psychology; Lottery; Eye movement; Cognition; Psychiatry; Neuroscience; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000210957,0.0000825611,0.000168986,0.00004539447,0.0001003506,0.00001292722,0.0001602162,0.00004015333,0.00048883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005762785,0.0000615375,0.00003500636,0.0001532866,0.000133828,0.0000406553,0.00002493756,0.00006775487,0.00007456684],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001081877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001217211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001651933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005100525,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990422,0.00009376636,0.0002373201,0.0001866117,0.0002961719,0.0001439749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990898,0.0001034157,0.000130862,0.0003596126,0.0002803553,0.00003593283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001712257,0.02205451,0.9394512,0.000004321326,0.0003713795,0.000003064673,0.001023353,1.163446e-7,0.03607471,0.0001111805,0.0001942578,0.0005407039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007203731,0.002001649,0.9714314,0.00003378101,0.0002338651,4.833615e-7,0.0009699643,0.000004281049,0.02445161,0.0000502227,0.00003500484,0.00006735454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985274,0.00009782545,0.000002812031,0.00002492578,0.0001657134,0.0002199901,0.00002999091,0.00002140231,0.0009099392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988629,0.000005270394,0.00009546799,0.00000579029,0.00008933593,0.000009407395,0.00002039838,0.00001368933,0.0008976901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03198023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5352345,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4887796069201365,"score_gpt":0.4654317340712426,"score_spread":0.02334787284889389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}