{"id":"W2786772699","doi":"10.1007/s10661-018-6494-9","title":"A criteria and indicators monitoring framework for food forestry embedded in the principles of ecological restoration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Victoria","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental resource management; Food security; Adaptive management; Agriculture; Promotion (chess); Monitoring and evaluation; Environmental planning; Restoration ecology; Business; Geography; Forestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028923,0.00130359,0.001339355,0.009059921,0.004405424,0.0136967,0.004004682,0.003351723,0.002503489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03594986,0.000698694,0.001431087,0.005907803,0.00980732,0.01109878,0.006269605,0.004188962,0.0006361076],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01423216,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02017176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02665276,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9786512,0.00835221,0.0028242,0.002001003,0.007109765,0.001061519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734692,0.005039966,0.003216559,0.002432016,0.0138962,0.001945999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001855952,0.0000658772,0.002749207,0.00009551933,0.00003337498,0.00007671081,0.000622239,0.01175773,0.0006521547,0.9439823,0.005598264,0.03434812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001507482,0.00007637197,0.003386768,0.0003316087,0.00005132968,0.0002092657,0.00152712,0.05580849,0.001768481,0.8756776,0.06106679,0.00008104927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005831473,0.0003767741,0.9631654,0.005237678,0.0001430463,0.0005540324,0.0004029167,0.0003589739,0.02392984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1605654,0.0002428103,0.8336772,0.0003477123,0.0001097759,0.0007796471,0.0004203397,0.0001001638,0.003756907],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1529613,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03182136223169447,"score_gpt":0.3260592843492284,"score_spread":0.294237922117534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}