{"id":"W2787149425","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12364","title":"A pure hedonic theory of utility and status: Unhappy but efficient invidious comparisons","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Lam Research","keywords":"Inefficiency; Happiness; Economics; Equating; Expected utility hypothesis; Welfare; Set (abstract data type); Utility theory; Microeconomics; Inequality; Affect (linguistics); Econometrics; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004735239,0.0001753911,0.0005463724,0.0002476492,0.00005610488,0.00004247233,0.0002766698,0.0001890509,0.003751189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001594659,0.0001401059,0.0001921136,0.00007609168,0.0002743549,0.0001316394,0.00005856039,0.0005199713,0.0001893451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001171062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001238545,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002355672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006362219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973053,0.001110651,0.0008199088,0.0002750171,0.0001088558,0.0003803062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997449,0.0009530692,0.0008888918,0.0004052998,0.00007012144,0.0002335861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001684142,0.0007229746,0.1752138,0.00005992936,0.0008273995,0.00001715281,0.003475725,0.0002928546,0.0005981693,0.7610422,0.005090824,0.05097483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006303827,0.001620232,0.7920291,0.0001119578,0.0001517356,0.0007159406,0.02225052,0.000280138,0.0001819064,0.1394879,0.03630454,0.0005621182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590628,0.001768453,0.001259569,0.0003069601,0.002081089,0.0001623309,0.00003173109,0.00002064345,0.03530641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987133,0.00008524481,0.00006492967,0.0002108023,0.0001530934,0.000002643759,0.000002248231,0.00001677496,0.000751003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6215543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03339234573444787,"score_gpt":0.2953780321682316,"score_spread":0.2619856864337837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}