{"id":"W2787877249","doi":"10.1007/s10393-017-1311-4","title":"Using a Harm Reduction Approach in an Environmental Case Study of Fish and Wildlife Health","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EcoHealth","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Animal ecology; Wildlife; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Public health; Harm; Harm reduction; Fishery; Reduction (mathematics); Environmental health; Environmental planning; Geography; Environmental protection; Ecology; Biology; Medicine; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003609453,0.00009944843,0.000178453,0.0000310172,0.0002179117,0.000007920045,0.00005265644,0.00002417539,0.00009971748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004398932,0.00008779081,0.00001240491,0.0001020384,0.0001635073,0.0001557206,0.0001271074,0.00008701821,0.000006417216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001522925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001124189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003136552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989693,0.0001277636,0.0002473611,0.0003060655,0.0001416872,0.0002077782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996202,0.000005059396,0.0001151976,0.0001499331,0.000002473705,0.0001071463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007924837,0.003144352,0.9091756,0.00008212336,0.00002095902,0.00004182018,0.06729323,0.0001410952,0.0009272213,0.000006410618,0.005338081,0.01374992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002441645,0.005767521,0.8788203,0.00002698502,0.0000237334,0.001037768,0.1014483,0.006459657,0.00005959924,0.00004606583,0.003423827,0.0004445785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985493,0.00001419912,0.000009429372,0.0001915683,0.00005875204,0.000424237,0.000004974417,0.000009038654,0.0007385466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998096,0.00002948947,0.001130135,0.0005798422,0.0001045903,0.000007374394,0.000003556466,0.000007703566,0.0000413149],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03415509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05124891740258639,"score_gpt":0.3231608908374879,"score_spread":0.2719119734349016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}