{"id":"W2787964877","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v8n3p276","title":"The Lawyer’s Discourse in the Courtroom: A Contrastive Study in English and Arabic","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jargon; Linguistics; Arabic; Plaintiff; Contrastive analysis; Psychology; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003450355,0.0003905244,0.0004917792,0.001982554,0.004425179,0.004022641,0.0006810903,0.001395364,0.003016882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01760272,0.0003872357,0.000207437,0.001461928,0.005220143,0.003975558,0.002683814,0.002107166,0.0003861712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00169032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007106568,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003920173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005434652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974636,0.001615194,0.0001716537,0.0002303192,0.0003265865,0.0001925744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889377,0.009015227,0.0009245296,0.0002254477,0.0005352864,0.0003617317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001614134,0.0004374486,0.009612821,0.0001481354,0.00001064527,0.0008714883,0.9739153,0.00003513173,0.007181779,0.003366839,0.0001481357,0.004110822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004917073,0.0004568091,0.05187768,0.0001836571,0.00002861778,0.001061198,0.9358388,0.0003436927,0.002540403,0.0008738207,0.006710716,0.00003534505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955865,0.000118393,0.0001970932,0.0001296277,0.000008309052,0.00002785035,0.00001086585,0.000001063965,0.003920389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988017,0.0001352341,0.0002142039,0.00009599226,0.00001801382,0.00004325039,0.00001367816,0.000004020394,0.0006738969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004425179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01824743,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0172015030421121,"score_gpt":0.3465249607563296,"score_spread":0.3293234577142175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}