{"id":"W2787964877","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v8n3p276","title":"The Lawyer’s Discourse in the Courtroom: A Contrastive Study in English and Arabic","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jargon; Linguistics; Arabic; Plaintiff; Contrastive analysis; Psychology; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593282,0.00007942627,0.0001240607,0.00001978069,0.000260213,0.0002625491,0.0006443259,0.0000626582,0.00001411796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06540363,0.00004591672,0.00005188976,0.0001430433,0.0006203102,0.0000857649,0.00004014214,0.0004365472,7.92018e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001073762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001614462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001400249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006304887,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983702,0.0003020805,0.0003525169,0.00009159254,0.0007084039,0.0001751996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897344,0.0009311159,0.0002293308,0.00007310624,0.008984311,0.00004769828],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001862991,0.000574135,0.08426747,0.000001759234,0.0001449759,0.0001069899,0.6969423,0.00002649907,7.462166e-7,0.2017385,0.01516386,0.000846438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199888,0.0001813709,0.02016389,0.00005225447,0.00002851582,9.400721e-7,0.3771515,0.00001812881,0.000002806724,0.007803797,0.5933067,0.00009022839],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7501406,0.0009752107,0.00002250716,0.001638262,0.03085383,0.0005346819,0.00002400483,0.00002062685,0.2157903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804231,0.0002910754,0.00004270123,0.0002399914,0.01888002,0.000003770949,6.521127e-7,0.000004082179,0.0001146481],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5781428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9424689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0172015030421121,"score_gpt":0.3465249607563296,"score_spread":0.3293234577142175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}