{"id":"W2788034503","doi":"10.1016/j.jmp.2018.07.005","title":"A better (Bayesian) interval estimate for within-subject designs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Psychology","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credible interval; Bayesian probability; Normalization (sociology); Mathematics; Heteroscedasticity; Interval estimation; Statistics; Confidence interval; Subject (documents); Interval (graph theory); Point estimation; Prior probability; Prediction interval; Tolerance interval; Econometrics; Computer science; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1008669,0.002708237,0.005809749,0.003023284,0.001133826,0.005637584,0.005409401,0.007727443,0.02269243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.349202,0.00287005,0.003512163,0.003021307,0.002231289,0.0102285,0.004684145,0.01141379,0.004213909],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001580209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002524411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009279104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001288587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8742334,0.09619267,0.004914935,0.01347727,0.01021743,0.000964233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6812522,0.2528557,0.007947785,0.04227154,0.01376568,0.00190701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005306842,0.001305991,0.00326138,0.002939382,0.002504304,0.0002029044,0.001373876,0.04647596,0.02745135,0.2260985,0.01135274,0.6717268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002124458,0.002116989,0.006687732,0.001124344,0.00142407,0.0007056391,0.0001498893,0.4399286,0.01680616,0.5032064,0.02524756,0.0004782648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001156185,0.0002168879,0.9975338,0.0001988052,0.0001047294,0.00007914504,0.00006630775,0.0003213491,0.0003226441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0223549,0.0001689945,0.9748406,0.0004930367,0.0001903709,0.0005959487,0.0002306285,0.0004008788,0.0007245584],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1008669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5334415,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3446720180437858,"score_gpt":0.5614297589589514,"score_spread":0.2167577409151656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}