{"id":"W2788207092","doi":"10.1017/s1474747214000523","title":"Evidence on individual preferences for longevity risk","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pensions Economics and Finance","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Longevity; Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Econometrics; Empirical evidence; Life expectancy; Expected utility hypothesis; Longevity risk; Neutrality; Actuarial science; Population; Demography; Financial economics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002710222,0.0001316185,0.0002411107,0.0006606007,0.0002823356,0.0009386502,0.0002385924,0.0005929288,0.006878473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01109951,0.0001303777,0.0002096209,0.0007820413,0.0004834977,0.0004433925,0.0004625187,0.0005032109,0.0004511295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001698538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009878938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001542095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001683186,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992417,0.0003811265,0.00004703622,0.0001049576,0.0001498081,0.00007528312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781276,0.01173817,0.006456294,0.001803291,0.0009346099,0.000940104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005844713,0.0001538122,0.9755831,0.00005125403,0.000211149,0.0001835782,0.001305487,0.00061077,0.000526583,0.002593118,0.0006523413,0.01754436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002012837,0.0002501804,0.9900064,0.00004522799,0.00008019104,0.0003812937,0.001591375,0.0009621369,0.0002849458,0.004340888,0.002017176,0.00002013793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994031,0.000232976,0.0002465631,0.0003264534,0.000005157994,0.000002143959,0.0001731009,0.000002530279,0.00497993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994679,0.0001021242,0.00004937279,0.00004264525,0.000004792621,0.000001065868,0.00007595128,5.919104e-7,0.000255602],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006878473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02301073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3379233653620882,"score_gpt":0.2652272249021217,"score_spread":0.07269614045996647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}